Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned notice blocking input tax credit could survive after approval of the resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the final rejection of the State's challenge to the insolvency orders.
Analysis: The resolution plan had been approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the State's claim had not been adjudicated or allowed in the corporate insolvency resolution process. The subsequent challenge mounted by the State against the insolvency orders had also failed. In these circumstances, the State could not continue to block the input tax credit or proceed on the basis of the impugned demand notice, because the claim stood outside the concluded resolution process and had attained finality.
Conclusion: The impugned notice was quashed and the respondents were directed to unblock the input tax credit and release the amount admissible in law; the petition was allowed.
Final Conclusion: Finality of the approved resolution plan and the failure of the State's challenges deprived the respondents of authority to enforce the blocked credit against the petitioner, while preserving any action available in law for recovery of dues, if any.
Ratio Decidendi: Once a resolution plan is approved and challenges to the insolvency orders fail, pre-existing claims not allowed in the corporate insolvency resolution process cannot be enforced independently against the corporate debtor.