Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Common area maintenance recoveries treated as business income supported allowance of related expenditure, and proportionate disallowance by reference to house property income was rejected where the assessee was contractually responsible only for common areas of the mall. Repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees, employee remuneration, advertisement and sales promotion, and security charges were each held to be linked to mall management and CAM obligations rather than to rental income, subject only to limited factual restriction in respect of office and general expenses. The Tribunal also upheld the appellate authority's power to entertain and direct verification of an additional property tax deduction claim arising from the record.
Common area maintenance recoveries treated as business income supported allowance of related expenditure, and proportionate disallowance by reference to house property income was rejected where the assessee was contractually responsible only for common areas of the mall. Repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees, employee remuneration, advertisement and sales promotion, and security charges were each held to be linked to mall management and CAM obligations rather than to rental income, subject only to limited factual restriction in respect of office and general expenses. The Tribunal also upheld the appellate authority's power to entertain and direct verification of an additional property tax deduction claim arising from the record.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
