<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Common area maintenance recoveries justify business expenditure allowance and limit apportionment against rental income claims.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99248</link>
    <description>Common area maintenance recoveries treated as business income supported allowance of related expenditure, and proportionate disallowance by reference to house property income was rejected where the assessee was contractually responsible only for common areas of the mall. Repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees, employee remuneration, advertisement and sales promotion, and security charges were each held to be linked to mall management and CAM obligations rather than to rental income, subject only to limited factual restriction in respect of office and general expenses. The Tribunal also upheld the appellate authority&#039;s power to entertain and direct verification of an additional property tax deduction claim arising from the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Common area maintenance recoveries justify business expenditure allowance and limit apportionment against rental income claims.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99248</link>
      <description>Common area maintenance recoveries treated as business income supported allowance of related expenditure, and proportionate disallowance by reference to house property income was rejected where the assessee was contractually responsible only for common areas of the mall. Repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees, employee remuneration, advertisement and sales promotion, and security charges were each held to be linked to mall management and CAM obligations rather than to rental income, subject only to limited factual restriction in respect of office and general expenses. The Tribunal also upheld the appellate authority&#039;s power to entertain and direct verification of an additional property tax deduction claim arising from the record.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>