Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Where a dependent agent permanent establishment in India has already been remunerated at arm's length, no further profits are attributable to that permanent establishment. Applying Morgan Stanley and Honda Motors, the ITAT held that the AO's ad hoc attribution of revenue and estimation of profit under Rule 10 was unjustified because the transfer pricing study had been furnished and the arm's length nature of the transactions was neither adversely examined nor doubted. The addition for further profit attribution was deleted, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic.
Where a dependent agent permanent establishment in India has already been remunerated at arm's length, no further profits are attributable to that permanent establishment. Applying Morgan Stanley and Honda Motors, the ITAT held that the AO's ad hoc attribution of revenue and estimation of profit under Rule 10 was unjustified because the transfer pricing study had been furnished and the arm's length nature of the transactions was neither adversely examined nor doubted. The addition for further profit attribution was deleted, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.