Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether any further profit could be attributed to the assessee's Indian dependent agent permanent establishment after the Indian associated enterprise had been remunerated at arm's length.
Analysis: The assessment records showed that the assessee had furnished transfer pricing material to demonstrate that the transactions with its Indian associated enterprise were at arm's length, and that this position was not doubted by the assessing authority. The Tribunal relied on the settled principle that where the Indian entity constituting the permanent establishment or dependent agent is already compensated at arm's length, no further profit can be attributed to the foreign enterprise merely on the basis of the existence of a permanent establishment. The ad hoc attribution of revenue and profits under Rule 10 was therefore unsupported on the facts and contrary to the settled legal position.
Conclusion: No further profit was liable to be attributed to the assessee's permanent establishment in India, and the addition was deleted.