Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Where a dependent agent permanent establishment in India has already been remunerated at arm's length, no further profits are attributable to that permanent establishment. Applying Morgan Stanley and Honda Motors, the ITAT held that the AO's ad hoc attribution of revenue and estimation of profit under Rule 10 was unjustified because the transfer pricing study had been furnished and the arm's length nature of the transactions was neither adversely examined nor doubted. The addition for further profit attribution was deleted, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic.
Where a dependent agent permanent establishment in India has already been remunerated at arm's length, no further profits are attributable to that permanent establishment. Applying Morgan Stanley and Honda Motors, the ITAT held that the AO's ad hoc attribution of revenue and estimation of profit under Rule 10 was unjustified because the transfer pricing study had been furnished and the arm's length nature of the transactions was neither adversely examined nor doubted. The addition for further profit attribution was deleted, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.