Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Where a dependent agent permanent establishment in India has already been remunerated at arm's length, no further profits are attributable to that permanent establishment. Applying Morgan Stanley and Honda Motors, the ITAT held that the AO's ad hoc attribution of revenue and estimation of profit under Rule 10 was unjustified because the transfer pricing study had been furnished and the arm's length nature of the transactions was neither adversely examined nor doubted. The addition for further profit attribution was deleted, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic.
Where a dependent agent permanent establishment in India has already been remunerated at arm's length, no further profits are attributable to that permanent establishment. Applying Morgan Stanley and Honda Motors, the ITAT held that the AO's ad hoc attribution of revenue and estimation of profit under Rule 10 was unjustified because the transfer pricing study had been furnished and the arm's length nature of the transactions was neither adversely examined nor doubted. The addition for further profit attribution was deleted, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
