Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Bogus purchase additions based on estimated profit were deleted where the assessee produced GST-linked purchase records, quantitative stock statements, movement details and payment evidence, and none of those books or results were found defective. In the absence of rejection of books or any finding that the disclosed gross profit was unreasonable, an 8% profit estimate on alleged bogus purchases was impermissible. The addition for alleged cessation of liability was also deleted because the ledger balance was supported by invoices and bank payments, and no adverse factual finding displaced that documentary evidence.
Bogus purchase additions based on estimated profit were deleted where the assessee produced GST-linked purchase records, quantitative stock statements, movement details and payment evidence, and none of those books or results were found defective. In the absence of rejection of books or any finding that the disclosed gross profit was unreasonable, an 8% profit estimate on alleged bogus purchases was impermissible. The addition for alleged cessation of liability was also deleted because the ledger balance was supported by invoices and bank payments, and no adverse factual finding displaced that documentary evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.