<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bogus purchase additions and alleged liability cessation deleted where documentary records and stock reconciliation supported the assessee</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99201</link>
    <description>Bogus purchase additions based on estimated profit were deleted where the assessee produced GST-linked purchase records, quantitative stock statements, movement details and payment evidence, and none of those books or results were found defective. In the absence of rejection of books or any finding that the disclosed gross profit was unreasonable, an 8% profit estimate on alleged bogus purchases was impermissible. The addition for alleged cessation of liability was also deleted because the ledger balance was supported by invoices and bank payments, and no adverse factual finding displaced that documentary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bogus purchase additions and alleged liability cessation deleted where documentary records and stock reconciliation supported the assessee</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99201</link>
      <description>Bogus purchase additions based on estimated profit were deleted where the assessee produced GST-linked purchase records, quantitative stock statements, movement details and payment evidence, and none of those books or results were found defective. In the absence of rejection of books or any finding that the disclosed gross profit was unreasonable, an 8% profit estimate on alleged bogus purchases was impermissible. The addition for alleged cessation of liability was also deleted because the ledger balance was supported by invoices and bank payments, and no adverse factual finding displaced that documentary evidence.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>