Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A writ petition may be entertained when the statutory appellate forum is not constituted or functional, but only to avoid leaving the aggrieved party remediless. Once the appellate forum became functional and the appeal period was extended through the notified mechanism, the writ court declined to keep the matter pending and left the dispute to the Tribunal. The earlier non-functioning of the forum did not waive the statutory pre-deposit condition for a second appeal. The petitioner was directed to file the statutory appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal within the prescribed timeline after complying with the required deposit, without any examination of the merits of the first appellate order.
A writ petition may be entertained when the statutory appellate forum is not constituted or functional, but only to avoid leaving the aggrieved party remediless. Once the appellate forum became functional and the appeal period was extended through the notified mechanism, the writ court declined to keep the matter pending and left the dispute to the Tribunal. The earlier non-functioning of the forum did not waive the statutory pre-deposit condition for a second appeal. The petitioner was directed to file the statutory appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal within the prescribed timeline after complying with the required deposit, without any examination of the merits of the first appellate order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
