Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition should be entertained in view of the statutory appeal provided under the GST regime and, if not, whether the petitioner must comply with the pre-deposit requirement and the prescribed filing timeline before the GST Appellate Tribunal.
Analysis: The challenge was to a tax order affirmed in appeal, while the statutory appellate remedy under Section 112 of the GST Act had become available with the Tribunal being made functional. The writ court noted that when a statutory appellate forum exists and is operational, the aggrieved person should ordinarily pursue that remedy. At the same time, the statutory conditions for filing the appeal, including payment of the admitted amount and the prescribed ten per cent of the disputed tax, remain mandatory. The court also noticed the notification and portal advisory extending and structuring the time for filing appeals before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained on merits and the petitioner was directed to avail the statutory appeal remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal by complying with the pre-deposit and timeline requirements.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory appellate forum is available and functional, writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass the statutory appeal mechanism or its mandatory pre-conditions, including pre-deposit.