Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
ITAT held that an addition for alleged under-valuation of export sales could not stand where the exports were not shown to be non-genuine and no evidence existed of any undisclosed consideration over and above the declared sale value. A valuation based only on copies of bills, without physical inspection of the exported goods, was treated as a merely estimated and notional exercise, especially when customs authorities had already verified the exports without objection to declared value. The Tribunal also noted that the variation fell within the tolerance range referred to before it. The deletion of the addition was therefore affirmed and the Revenue's challenge failed.
ITAT held that an addition for alleged under-valuation of export sales could not stand where the exports were not shown to be non-genuine and no evidence existed of any undisclosed consideration over and above the declared sale value. A valuation based only on copies of bills, without physical inspection of the exported goods, was treated as a merely estimated and notional exercise, especially when customs authorities had already verified the exports without objection to declared value. The Tribunal also noted that the variation fell within the tolerance range referred to before it. The deletion of the addition was therefore affirmed and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.