Genuineness of investment evidence determines LTCG entitlement; non specific regulatory reports cannot displace transaction specific documentary proof...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5881 to 5900 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT rejected the Revenue's Rule 46A objection because the EPCG licence documents and computation were already part of the record before the Assessing Officer, and no fresh evidence had been admitted by the first appellate authority. It further upheld deletion of the addition relating to the Government grant, holding that the amount had been credited in the books under Ind-AS-compliant accounting, was tax neutral for income-tax purposes, and had already been included in the returned total income. A further addition would therefore result in double addition. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
ITAT rejected the Revenue's Rule 46A objection because the EPCG licence documents and computation were already part of the record before the Assessing Officer, and no fresh evidence had been admitted by the first appellate authority. It further upheld deletion of the addition relating to the Government grant, holding that the amount had been credited in the books under Ind-AS-compliant accounting, was tax neutral for income-tax purposes, and had already been included in the returned total income. A further addition would therefore result in double addition. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
