<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rule 46A objection and double addition claim fail where government grant was already offered in return and taxed neutrally.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99087</link>
    <description>ITAT rejected the Revenue&#039;s Rule 46A objection because the EPCG licence documents and computation were already part of the record before the Assessing Officer, and no fresh evidence had been admitted by the first appellate authority. It further upheld deletion of the addition relating to the Government grant, holding that the amount had been credited in the books under Ind-AS-compliant accounting, was tax neutral for income-tax purposes, and had already been included in the returned total income. A further addition would therefore result in double addition. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:01:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rule 46A objection and double addition claim fail where government grant was already offered in return and taxed neutrally.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99087</link>
      <description>ITAT rejected the Revenue&#039;s Rule 46A objection because the EPCG licence documents and computation were already part of the record before the Assessing Officer, and no fresh evidence had been admitted by the first appellate authority. It further upheld deletion of the addition relating to the Government grant, holding that the amount had been credited in the books under Ind-AS-compliant accounting, was tax neutral for income-tax purposes, and had already been included in the returned total income. A further addition would therefore result in double addition. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:01:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>