Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT rejected the Revenue's Rule 46A objection because the EPCG licence documents and computation were already part of the record before the Assessing Officer, and no fresh evidence had been admitted by the first appellate authority. It further upheld deletion of the addition relating to the Government grant, holding that the amount had been credited in the books under Ind-AS-compliant accounting, was tax neutral for income-tax purposes, and had already been included in the returned total income. A further addition would therefore result in double addition. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
ITAT rejected the Revenue's Rule 46A objection because the EPCG licence documents and computation were already part of the record before the Assessing Officer, and no fresh evidence had been admitted by the first appellate authority. It further upheld deletion of the addition relating to the Government grant, holding that the amount had been credited in the books under Ind-AS-compliant accounting, was tax neutral for income-tax purposes, and had already been included in the returned total income. A further addition would therefore result in double addition. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
