Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In computing deduction under Section 10A, expenses excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; otherwise the formula becomes unworkable and produces an absurd result. Applying the earlier Division Bench ruling and the Supreme Court decision in HCL Technologies, the HC answered this question in favour of the assessee. On interest disallowance relating to advances to a subsidiary, the court noted that the factual issue whether the investment had a business nexus had not been examined by the lower authorities. It therefore remitted that issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce material.
In computing deduction under Section 10A, expenses excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; otherwise the formula becomes unworkable and produces an absurd result. Applying the earlier Division Bench ruling and the Supreme Court decision in HCL Technologies, the HC answered this question in favour of the assessee. On interest disallowance relating to advances to a subsidiary, the court noted that the factual issue whether the investment had a business nexus had not been examined by the lower authorities. It therefore remitted that issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.