<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 10A turnover parity and subsidiary investment nexus resolved in part, with one issue remitted for fresh scrutiny.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99047</link>
    <description>In computing deduction under Section 10A, expenses excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; otherwise the formula becomes unworkable and produces an absurd result. Applying the earlier Division Bench ruling and the Supreme Court decision in HCL Technologies, the HC answered this question in favour of the assessee. On interest disallowance relating to advances to a subsidiary, the court noted that the factual issue whether the investment had a business nexus had not been examined by the lower authorities. It therefore remitted that issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 10A turnover parity and subsidiary investment nexus resolved in part, with one issue remitted for fresh scrutiny.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99047</link>
      <description>In computing deduction under Section 10A, expenses excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; otherwise the formula becomes unworkable and produces an absurd result. Applying the earlier Division Bench ruling and the Supreme Court decision in HCL Technologies, the HC answered this question in favour of the assessee. On interest disallowance relating to advances to a subsidiary, the court noted that the factual issue whether the investment had a business nexus had not been examined by the lower authorities. It therefore remitted that issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce material.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>