Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Export turnover and total turnover must be computed on a parity basis for Section 10A deduction, so foreign-exchange expenditure excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; the issue was decided for the assessee. Depreciation claims relating to goodwill and non-compete rights were not finally determined, as the matter was remitted for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's guidance on acquisition parameters. Apportionment of common disallowance between STP and non-STP units was treated as a factual question, and the concurrent view that a lump-sum disallowance was improper was upheld for the assessee. Interest disallowance on advances to subsidiaries was remitted for fresh examination on whether the investment had a business nexus.
Export turnover and total turnover must be computed on a parity basis for Section 10A deduction, so foreign-exchange expenditure excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; the issue was decided for the assessee. Depreciation claims relating to goodwill and non-compete rights were not finally determined, as the matter was remitted for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's guidance on acquisition parameters. Apportionment of common disallowance between STP and non-STP units was treated as a factual question, and the concurrent view that a lump-sum disallowance was improper was upheld for the assessee. Interest disallowance on advances to subsidiaries was remitted for fresh examination on whether the investment had a business nexus.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.