<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 10A parity, goodwill depreciation, and business nexus of subsidiary advances shaped the tax dispute outcomes.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99046</link>
    <description>Export turnover and total turnover must be computed on a parity basis for Section 10A deduction, so foreign-exchange expenditure excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; the issue was decided for the assessee. Depreciation claims relating to goodwill and non-compete rights were not finally determined, as the matter was remitted for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s guidance on acquisition parameters. Apportionment of common disallowance between STP and non-STP units was treated as a factual question, and the concurrent view that a lump-sum disallowance was improper was upheld for the assessee. Interest disallowance on advances to subsidiaries was remitted for fresh examination on whether the investment had a business nexus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 10A parity, goodwill depreciation, and business nexus of subsidiary advances shaped the tax dispute outcomes.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99046</link>
      <description>Export turnover and total turnover must be computed on a parity basis for Section 10A deduction, so foreign-exchange expenditure excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; the issue was decided for the assessee. Depreciation claims relating to goodwill and non-compete rights were not finally determined, as the matter was remitted for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s guidance on acquisition parameters. Apportionment of common disallowance between STP and non-STP units was treated as a factual question, and the concurrent view that a lump-sum disallowance was improper was upheld for the assessee. Interest disallowance on advances to subsidiaries was remitted for fresh examination on whether the investment had a business nexus.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>