Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Export turnover and total turnover must be computed on a parity basis for Section 10A deduction, so foreign-exchange expenditure excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; the issue was decided for the assessee. Depreciation claims relating to goodwill and non-compete rights were not finally determined, as the matter was remitted for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's guidance on acquisition parameters. Apportionment of common disallowance between STP and non-STP units was treated as a factual question, and the concurrent view that a lump-sum disallowance was improper was upheld for the assessee. Interest disallowance on advances to subsidiaries was remitted for fresh examination on whether the investment had a business nexus.
Export turnover and total turnover must be computed on a parity basis for Section 10A deduction, so foreign-exchange expenditure excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover; the issue was decided for the assessee. Depreciation claims relating to goodwill and non-compete rights were not finally determined, as the matter was remitted for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's guidance on acquisition parameters. Apportionment of common disallowance between STP and non-STP units was treated as a factual question, and the concurrent view that a lump-sum disallowance was improper was upheld for the assessee. Interest disallowance on advances to subsidiaries was remitted for fresh examination on whether the investment had a business nexus.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.