Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Judicial restraint applied where a writ petition sought mandamus to enforce statutory duties against alleged tax evasion based on disputed unaccounted cash transactions and supporting material. The Court held that the Single Judge was in declining to enter the merits and in refusing mandamus at that stage, because no illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional error was shown in that approach. The writ jurisdiction was therefore not interfered with in appeal, and the writ appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.
Judicial restraint applied where a writ petition sought mandamus to enforce statutory duties against alleged tax evasion based on disputed unaccounted cash transactions and supporting material. The Court held that the Single Judge was in declining to enter the merits and in refusing mandamus at that stage, because no illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional error was shown in that approach. The writ jurisdiction was therefore not interfered with in appeal, and the writ appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
