Writ of mandamus refused where no jurisdictional error was shown in the tax inaction challenge.

A writ of mandamus was declined where the relief sought sought directions against tax authorities on alleged inaction regarding tax evasion, because no illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional error was shown in the order under challenge. The court also noted that the petition had been rejected without examining the merits of the allegations or the statutory duties of the authorities, and that liberty remained to pursue appropriate remedies. The refusal to interfere was therefore upheld, and the writ appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the writ court was justified in declining to issue a writ of mandamus and in dismissing the writ petition seeking directions against the tax authorities on the alleged non-action concerning tax evasion.

Analysis: The petition was dismissed on the view that, having regard to the facts and the nature of the relief sought, no mandamus could be issued at that stage. The Court did not find any illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional error in the order under challenge. It also noted that the petition had been rejected without entering into the merits of the allegations or the statutory obligations of the authorities, and that liberty had been granted to pursue appropriate remedies.

Conclusion: The refusal to interfere was upheld and the challenge to the dismissal of the writ petition failed.

Final Conclusion: The writ appeal was rejected, leaving the dismissal of the writ petition undisturbed.

---