Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a writ of mandamus could be issued to compel the Income Tax Department to investigate the tax evasion petition and grant the consequential reliefs sought.
Analysis: The reliefs sought were discretionary in nature and depended on compelling the tax authorities to initiate, complete, and act upon an investigation at the petitioner's instance. The request was also met with the objection that the tax evasion petition had already been rejected as time-barred. On the facts placed before the Court, no ground was made out for issuance of a writ of mandamus.
Conclusion: The prayer for mandamus was declined and the writ petition was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained no substantive relief in the writ proceedings, though liberty was reserved to raise his defence before the criminal court.
Ratio Decidendi: A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel tax authorities to undertake the investigation and consequential action sought where no enforceable legal right to such relief is shown.