Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Judicial restraint applied where a writ petition sought mandamus to enforce statutory duties against alleged tax evasion based on disputed unaccounted cash transactions and supporting material. The Court held that the Single Judge was in declining to enter the merits and in refusing mandamus at that stage, because no illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional error was shown in that approach. The writ jurisdiction was therefore not interfered with in appeal, and the writ appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.
Judicial restraint applied where a writ petition sought mandamus to enforce statutory duties against alleged tax evasion based on disputed unaccounted cash transactions and supporting material. The Court held that the Single Judge was in declining to enter the merits and in refusing mandamus at that stage, because no illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional error was shown in that approach. The writ jurisdiction was therefore not interfered with in appeal, and the writ appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
