Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Judicial restraint applied where a writ petition sought mandamus to enforce statutory duties against alleged tax evasion based on disputed unaccounted cash transactions and supporting material. The Court held that the Single Judge was in declining to enter the merits and in refusing mandamus at that stage, because no illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional error was shown in that approach. The writ jurisdiction was therefore not interfered with in appeal, and the writ appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.
Judicial restraint applied where a writ petition sought mandamus to enforce statutory duties against alleged tax evasion based on disputed unaccounted cash transactions and supporting material. The Court held that the Single Judge was in declining to enter the merits and in refusing mandamus at that stage, because no illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional error was shown in that approach. The writ jurisdiction was therefore not interfered with in appeal, and the writ appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
