Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Under the unamended GST framework, an Input Service Distributor could not procure and distribute credit relating to common services liable to reverse charge through the ISD route, because the then-existing definition barred such procurement. The later Finance Act, 2024 remedy applies only from 01.04.2025, so it did not govern the disputed period. For that period, the CBIC circular of 17.07.2023 clarified that common credit need not be routed only through ISD and could also be transferred by tax invoice under Section 31. As the taxpayer had used ISD for forward charge credit and tax invoices for reverse charge common credit, and had availed only eligible credit, the contrary order was quashed.
Under the unamended GST framework, an Input Service Distributor could not procure and distribute credit relating to common services liable to reverse charge through the ISD route, because the then-existing definition barred such procurement. The later Finance Act, 2024 remedy applies only from 01.04.2025, so it did not govern the disputed period. For that period, the CBIC circular of 17.07.2023 clarified that common credit need not be routed only through ISD and could also be transferred by tax invoice under Section 31. As the taxpayer had used ISD for forward charge credit and tax invoices for reverse charge common credit, and had availed only eligible credit, the contrary order was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
