Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, for the relevant tax period, common input tax credit in respect of services procured by the head office could be distributed to branch offices either through the Input Service Distributor mechanism or by issuing tax invoices under section 31 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The Head Office procured common input services used by multiple State registrations. The statutory definition of Input Service Distributor under section 2(61) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, as it then stood, did not expressly cover credit relatable to services on which tax was paid under reverse charge mechanism. The Board's circular clarified that distribution of common input service credit through the ISD route was not mandatory and that the Head Office could also issue tax invoices under section 31 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, with the recipient units availing credit subject to sections 16 and 17. The circular being binding on the departmental authorities, the impugned demand, which proceeded on the premise that ISD was the only permissible mode, could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The alternative distribution of common input tax credit by issuing tax invoices was lawful, ISD was not mandatory for the relevant period, and the demand confirmation was unsustainable.