Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The NCLAT declined to interfere with an interim protective order in oppression and mismanagement proceedings, holding that the order merely preserved the status quo and protected the subject matter pending NCLT adjudication. It found the appellants' complaint that their case had not been considered to be unfounded because the impugned order recorded their stand. The Tribunal also noted that the earlier restraint order had not been challenged. As no appellate error was shown in the discretionary interim arrangement, the modified directions already issued concerning operation of the bank accounts were continued.
The NCLAT declined to interfere with an interim protective order in oppression and mismanagement proceedings, holding that the order merely preserved the status quo and protected the subject matter pending NCLT adjudication. It found the appellants' complaint that their case had not been considered to be unfounded because the impugned order recorded their stand. The Tribunal also noted that the earlier restraint order had not been challenged. As no appellate error was shown in the discretionary interim arrangement, the modified directions already issued concerning operation of the bank accounts were continued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
