https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98872 The NCLAT declined to interfere with an interim protective order in oppression and mismanagement proceedings, holding that the order merely preserved the status quo and protected the subject matter pending NCLT adjudication. It found the appellants' complaint that their case had not been considered to be unfounded because the impugned order recorded their stand. The Tribunal also noted that the earlier restraint order had not been challenged. As no appellate error was shown in the discretionary interim arrangement, the modified directions already issued concerning operation of the bank accounts were continued. en-us Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98872 The NCLAT declined to interfere with an interim protective order in oppression and mismanagement proceedings, holding that the order merely preserved the status quo and protected the subject matter pending NCLT adjudication. It found the appellants' complaint that their case had not been considered to be unfounded because the impugned order recorded their stand. The Tribunal also noted that the earlier restraint order had not been challenged. As no appellate error was shown in the discretionary interim arrangement, the modified directions already issued concerning operation of the bank accounts were continued. Highlights Companies Law Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98872