Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
The NCLAT declined to interfere with an interim protective order in oppression and mismanagement proceedings, holding that the order merely preserved the status quo and protected the subject matter pending NCLT adjudication. It found the appellants' complaint that their case had not been considered to be unfounded because the impugned order recorded their stand. The Tribunal also noted that the earlier restraint order had not been challenged. As no appellate error was shown in the discretionary interim arrangement, the modified directions already issued concerning operation of the bank accounts were continued.
The NCLAT declined to interfere with an interim protective order in oppression and mismanagement proceedings, holding that the order merely preserved the status quo and protected the subject matter pending NCLT adjudication. It found the appellants' complaint that their case had not been considered to be unfounded because the impugned order recorded their stand. The Tribunal also noted that the earlier restraint order had not been challenged. As no appellate error was shown in the discretionary interim arrangement, the modified directions already issued concerning operation of the bank accounts were continued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
