Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For a search assessment of an "other person" under section 153C, the relevant date for identifying the block of assessment years is when the seized material is handed over by the searched person's Assessing Officer to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. As the satisfaction and handing over occurred on 26.03.2019, AY 2017-18 fell within the section 153C block. The AO's resort to section 143(3) was therefore without valid jurisdiction, and the assessment for AY 2017-18 was invalid on that basis. The ITAT upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue's challenge.
For a search assessment of an "other person" under section 153C, the relevant date for identifying the block of assessment years is when the seized material is handed over by the searched person's Assessing Officer to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. As the satisfaction and handing over occurred on 26.03.2019, AY 2017-18 fell within the section 153C block. The AO's resort to section 143(3) was therefore without valid jurisdiction, and the assessment for AY 2017-18 was invalid on that basis. The ITAT upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue's challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
