<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 153C jurisdiction in search cases depends on handover date of seized material; assessment under section 143(3) was invalid.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98853</link>
    <description>For a search assessment of an &quot;other person&quot; under section 153C, the relevant date for identifying the block of assessment years is when the seized material is handed over by the searched person&#039;s Assessing Officer to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. As the satisfaction and handing over occurred on 26.03.2019, AY 2017-18 fell within the section 153C block. The AO&#039;s resort to section 143(3) was therefore without valid jurisdiction, and the assessment for AY 2017-18 was invalid on that basis. The ITAT upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:34:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:34:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 153C jurisdiction in search cases depends on handover date of seized material; assessment under section 143(3) was invalid.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98853</link>
      <description>For a search assessment of an &quot;other person&quot; under section 153C, the relevant date for identifying the block of assessment years is when the seized material is handed over by the searched person&#039;s Assessing Officer to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. As the satisfaction and handing over occurred on 26.03.2019, AY 2017-18 fell within the section 153C block. The AO&#039;s resort to section 143(3) was therefore without valid jurisdiction, and the assessment for AY 2017-18 was invalid on that basis. The ITAT upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:34:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>