Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Faceless assessment requires a mandatory show cause notice under...
Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural justice.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Faceless assessment requires a mandatory show cause notice under section 144B(1)(xii) specifying each variation prejudicial to the assessee. Where the notice proposed only an ad hoc income estimate at 8% of turnover, but the final assessment instead made separate additions for unsecured loans and disallowances of interest and other expenses, the statutory notice requirement was not satisfied. Those final variations were not covered by the notice, so the assessment proceeded in breach of section 144B(1)(xii) and natural justice. The Tribunal sustained deletion of the additions and disallowances and dismissed the Revenue's challenge.
Faceless assessment requires a mandatory show cause notice under section 144B(1)(xii) specifying each variation prejudicial to the assessee. Where the notice proposed only an ad hoc income estimate at 8% of turnover, but the final assessment instead made separate additions for unsecured loans and disallowances of interest and other expenses, the statutory notice requirement was not satisfied. Those final variations were not covered by the notice, so the assessment proceeded in breach of section 144B(1)(xii) and natural justice. The Tribunal sustained deletion of the additions and disallowances and dismissed the Revenue's challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.