Customs valuation and import permissibility conflict resolved: accepted enhancement of transaction value removes liability for confiscation and penalt...
Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6601 to 6620 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Faceless assessment requires a mandatory show cause notice under...
Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural justice.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Faceless assessment requires a mandatory show cause notice under section 144B(1)(xii) specifying each variation prejudicial to the assessee. Where the notice proposed only an ad hoc income estimate at 8% of turnover, but the final assessment instead made separate additions for unsecured loans and disallowances of interest and other expenses, the statutory notice requirement was not satisfied. Those final variations were not covered by the notice, so the assessment proceeded in breach of section 144B(1)(xii) and natural justice. The Tribunal sustained deletion of the additions and disallowances and dismissed the Revenue's challenge.
Faceless assessment requires a mandatory show cause notice under section 144B(1)(xii) specifying each variation prejudicial to the assessee. Where the notice proposed only an ad hoc income estimate at 8% of turnover, but the final assessment instead made separate additions for unsecured loans and disallowances of interest and other expenses, the statutory notice requirement was not satisfied. Those final variations were not covered by the notice, so the assessment proceeded in breach of section 144B(1)(xii) and natural justice. The Tribunal sustained deletion of the additions and disallowances and dismissed the Revenue's challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.