Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Once a Section 9 application was admitted and an interim resolution professional appointed, control of the corporate debtor's affairs vested in the IRP, so a suspended director could not file an appeal in the corporate debtor's name as its authorised representative. The appeal was inherently non-maintainable at inception, not a curable procedural defect, and the NCLAT erred in allowing later amendment of the cause title and memo of appeal. Given the strict limitation regime under the Code, with only a limited condonable period, the belated attempt to convert the incompetent appeal into a valid one was rejected. The appeal was dismissed on this ground alone.
Once a Section 9 application was admitted and an interim resolution professional appointed, control of the corporate debtor's affairs vested in the IRP, so a suspended director could not file an appeal in the corporate debtor's name as its authorised representative. The appeal was inherently non-maintainable at inception, not a curable procedural defect, and the NCLAT erred in allowing later amendment of the cause title and memo of appeal. Given the strict limitation regime under the Code, with only a limited condonable period, the belated attempt to convert the incompetent appeal into a valid one was rejected. The appeal was dismissed on this ground alone.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.