<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Insolvency appeal maintainability fails where a suspended director files in the corporate debtor&#039;s name after IRP appointment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98805</link>
    <description>Once a Section 9 application was admitted and an interim resolution professional appointed, control of the corporate debtor&#039;s affairs vested in the IRP, so a suspended director could not file an appeal in the corporate debtor&#039;s name as its authorised representative. The appeal was inherently non-maintainable at inception, not a curable procedural defect, and the NCLAT erred in allowing later amendment of the cause title and memo of appeal. Given the strict limitation regime under the Code, with only a limited condonable period, the belated attempt to convert the incompetent appeal into a valid one was rejected. The appeal was dismissed on this ground alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Insolvency appeal maintainability fails where a suspended director files in the corporate debtor&#039;s name after IRP appointment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98805</link>
      <description>Once a Section 9 application was admitted and an interim resolution professional appointed, control of the corporate debtor&#039;s affairs vested in the IRP, so a suspended director could not file an appeal in the corporate debtor&#039;s name as its authorised representative. The appeal was inherently non-maintainable at inception, not a curable procedural defect, and the NCLAT erred in allowing later amendment of the cause title and memo of appeal. Given the strict limitation regime under the Code, with only a limited condonable period, the belated attempt to convert the incompetent appeal into a valid one was rejected. The appeal was dismissed on this ground alone.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>