Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Limitation for insolvency appeals runs from the date an NCLAT order is pronounced in open court, and later uploading of the order does not postpone the start of time. Exclusion for time taken to obtain a certified copy was unavailable because there was no showing that the appellants applied for the copy within the limitation period. As the insolvency code is a self-contained statute with only a limited condonable delay of fifteen days beyond the initial period, an appeal filed on the 46th day was beyond the maximum permissible limit and could not be entertained; the delay applications were rejected and both appeals were dismissed as time-barred.
Limitation for insolvency appeals runs from the date an NCLAT order is pronounced in open court, and later uploading of the order does not postpone the start of time. Exclusion for time taken to obtain a certified copy was unavailable because there was no showing that the appellants applied for the copy within the limitation period. As the insolvency code is a self-contained statute with only a limited condonable delay of fifteen days beyond the initial period, an appeal filed on the 46th day was beyond the maximum permissible limit and could not be entertained; the delay applications were rejected and both appeals were dismissed as time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.