Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay in filing the company appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 could be condoned, and whether limitation commenced from the date of pronouncement of the impugned order in open court.
Analysis: The appeals challenged approval of the resolution plan, but the decisive question was limitation. The applicable appellate provision prescribed a 30-day filing period with a further condonable period not exceeding 15 days. The impugned order was pronounced in open court on 28.10.2025, so limitation commenced from that date. The appellants did not obtain or seek the certified copy within the statutory period, and the benefit of exclusion under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 was therefore unavailable. Since the appeals were filed on 13.12.2025, they fell beyond the maximum permissible period of 45 days. The governing limitation under the special statute was treated as strict and incapable of extension beyond the proviso.
Conclusion: The delay was not condonable. The appeals were held to be barred by limitation and were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: For an appeal under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against an order pronounced in open court, limitation runs from the date of pronouncement, and exclusion for obtaining a certified copy is available only if the appellant applies for it within the prescribed limitation period; the appellate tribunal cannot condone delay beyond the statutory maximum.