Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6361 to 6380 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Limitation for insolvency appeals runs from the date an NCLAT order is pronounced in open court, and later uploading of the order does not postpone the start of time. Exclusion for time taken to obtain a certified copy was unavailable because there was no showing that the appellants applied for the copy within the limitation period. As the insolvency code is a self-contained statute with only a limited condonable delay of fifteen days beyond the initial period, an appeal filed on the 46th day was beyond the maximum permissible limit and could not be entertained; the delay applications were rejected and both appeals were dismissed as time-barred.
Limitation for insolvency appeals runs from the date an NCLAT order is pronounced in open court, and later uploading of the order does not postpone the start of time. Exclusion for time taken to obtain a certified copy was unavailable because there was no showing that the appellants applied for the copy within the limitation period. As the insolvency code is a self-contained statute with only a limited condonable delay of fifteen days beyond the initial period, an appeal filed on the 46th day was beyond the maximum permissible limit and could not be entertained; the delay applications were rejected and both appeals were dismissed as time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.