Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where an adjudication order is passed in breach of an interim order, the High Court permitted withdrawal of the order on the State's statement and treated it as withdrawn. The consequence was that the adjudication could not survive, and the show cause notice had to be adjudicated afresh in accordance with law after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Relying on earlier orders, the Court declined to examine the constitutional validity challenge and expressly kept that issue, along with all other contentions, open while directing fresh adjudication within the time fixed by the Court.
Where an adjudication order is passed in breach of an interim order, the High Court permitted withdrawal of the order on the State's statement and treated it as withdrawn. The consequence was that the adjudication could not survive, and the show cause notice had to be adjudicated afresh in accordance with law after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Relying on earlier orders, the Court declined to examine the constitutional validity challenge and expressly kept that issue, along with all other contentions, open while directing fresh adjudication within the time fixed by the Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.