Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: The effect of the subsequently passed adjudication order on the show cause notice, and whether the matter should be sent back for fresh adjudication after granting a hearing.
Analysis: The adjudication order dated 19 December 2023, having been passed after the interim protection already granted by the Court, was permitted to be withdrawn and was therefore set aside as withdrawn. The show cause notice itself was not quashed on merits. The proceedings were directed to be adjudicated afresh in accordance with law after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The challenge to the validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act and MGST Act was expressly kept open, and all other contentions were also left open.
Conclusion: The impugned adjudication order was set aside as withdrawn, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication with an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained limited procedural relief, while the substantive constitutional challenge remained undecided.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an adjudication order is passed contrary to an existing interim protection, it can be withdrawn and set aside, and the matter may be remitted for fresh consideration with a hearing to the affected party.