Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Where an adjudication order is passed in breach of an interim order, the High Court permitted withdrawal of the order on the State's statement and treated it as withdrawn. The consequence was that the adjudication could not survive, and the show cause notice had to be adjudicated afresh in accordance with law after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Relying on earlier orders, the Court declined to examine the constitutional validity challenge and expressly kept that issue, along with all other contentions, open while directing fresh adjudication within the time fixed by the Court.
Where an adjudication order is passed in breach of an interim order, the High Court permitted withdrawal of the order on the State's statement and treated it as withdrawn. The consequence was that the adjudication could not survive, and the show cause notice had to be adjudicated afresh in accordance with law after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Relying on earlier orders, the Court declined to examine the constitutional validity challenge and expressly kept that issue, along with all other contentions, open while directing fresh adjudication within the time fixed by the Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.