Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
HC held that a registered co-operative credit society providing...
Co-operative credit society deduction on bank deposit interest upheld where funds were business funds and income remained attributable to member credit activities.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
HC held that a registered co-operative credit society providing credit facilities to its members was entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest earned from bank deposits, because the deposited funds were its own business funds and the interest retained the character of business income attributable to that activity. The Court followed earlier Division Bench rulings and distinguished the Supreme Court decision in Citizens Co-operative Society Limited, noting that case involved dealings with non-members and a finance business where mutuality was absent; the contrary orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for reconsideration accordingly.
HC held that a registered co-operative credit society providing credit facilities to its members was entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest earned from bank deposits, because the deposited funds were its own business funds and the interest retained the character of business income attributable to that activity. The Court followed earlier Division Bench rulings and distinguished the Supreme Court decision in Citizens Co-operative Society Limited, noting that case involved dealings with non-members and a finance business where mutuality was absent; the contrary orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for reconsideration accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.