Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that estimated gross on-money receipts could not be taxed in full where the record also showed unaccounted funds being routed into the books as unsecured loans through the admitted modus operandi. Because the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the lenders, the unsecured loans were treated as unexplained and the CIT(A)'s restricted additions were sustained for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal also rejected further telescoping based on income earlier declared, and upheld the CIT(A)'s approach as the correct basis of taxation. The Revenue's appeal and the assessee's appeals were dismissed.
ITAT held that estimated gross on-money receipts could not be taxed in full where the record also showed unaccounted funds being routed into the books as unsecured loans through the admitted modus operandi. Because the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the lenders, the unsecured loans were treated as unexplained and the CIT(A)'s restricted additions were sustained for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal also rejected further telescoping based on income earlier declared, and upheld the CIT(A)'s approach as the correct basis of taxation. The Revenue's appeal and the assessee's appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.