<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unexplained unsecured loans and on-money receipts: ITAT upheld restricted additions while rejecting full taxation of estimated receipts.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98649</link>
    <description>ITAT held that estimated gross on-money receipts could not be taxed in full where the record also showed unaccounted funds being routed into the books as unsecured loans through the admitted modus operandi. Because the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the lenders, the unsecured loans were treated as unexplained and the CIT(A)&#039;s restricted additions were sustained for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal also rejected further telescoping based on income earlier declared, and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s approach as the correct basis of taxation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:00:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:00:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unexplained unsecured loans and on-money receipts: ITAT upheld restricted additions while rejecting full taxation of estimated receipts.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98649</link>
      <description>ITAT held that estimated gross on-money receipts could not be taxed in full where the record also showed unaccounted funds being routed into the books as unsecured loans through the admitted modus operandi. Because the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the lenders, the unsecured loans were treated as unexplained and the CIT(A)&#039;s restricted additions were sustained for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal also rejected further telescoping based on income earlier declared, and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s approach as the correct basis of taxation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:00:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>