Extended limitation requires willful misstatement or suppression with intent to evade; mere misclassification does not sustain confiscation or penalty...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6021 to 6040 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that estimated gross on-money receipts could not be taxed in full where the record also showed unaccounted funds being routed into the books as unsecured loans through the admitted modus operandi. Because the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the lenders, the unsecured loans were treated as unexplained and the CIT(A)'s restricted additions were sustained for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal also rejected further telescoping based on income earlier declared, and upheld the CIT(A)'s approach as the correct basis of taxation. The Revenue's appeal and the assessee's appeals were dismissed.
ITAT held that estimated gross on-money receipts could not be taxed in full where the record also showed unaccounted funds being routed into the books as unsecured loans through the admitted modus operandi. Because the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the lenders, the unsecured loans were treated as unexplained and the CIT(A)'s restricted additions were sustained for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal also rejected further telescoping based on income earlier declared, and upheld the CIT(A)'s approach as the correct basis of taxation. The Revenue's appeal and the assessee's appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.