Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For private discretionary trusts whose income is chargeable at the maximum marginal rate, surcharge on income tax is to be computed by reference to the slab rates prescribed in the Finance Act for the relevant year. Applying the Special Bench ruling in Aradhya Jain Trust, the ITAT held that the assessee correctly claimed surcharge at 15% and that the lower appellate authority erred in sustaining surcharge at 25%. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside and the assessee's claim was accepted.
For private discretionary trusts whose income is chargeable at the maximum marginal rate, surcharge on income tax is to be computed by reference to the slab rates prescribed in the Finance Act for the relevant year. Applying the Special Bench ruling in Aradhya Jain Trust, the ITAT held that the assessee correctly claimed surcharge at 15% and that the lower appellate authority erred in sustaining surcharge at 25%. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside and the assessee's claim was accepted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
