Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing tax on the assessee AOP, surcharge was leviable at 25% as applied by the authorities or at 15% as claimed by the assessee.
Analysis: The issue was treated as no longer res integra in view of the Special Bench decision holding that, in the case of private discretionary trusts whose income is chargeable at the maximum marginal rate, surcharge has to be computed with reference to the slab rates prescribed in the Finance Act under the head of surcharge on income tax applicable to the relevant assessment year. Following that view, the lower authority's approach of applying surcharge at 25% was found to be unsustainable, and the assessee's claim for surcharge at 15% was accepted.
Conclusion: The surcharge was required to be computed at 15% and not at 25%, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.