Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
For private discretionary trusts whose income is chargeable at the maximum marginal rate, surcharge on income tax is to be computed by reference to the slab rates prescribed in the Finance Act for the relevant year. Applying the Special Bench ruling in Aradhya Jain Trust, the ITAT held that the assessee correctly claimed surcharge at 15% and that the lower appellate authority erred in sustaining surcharge at 25%. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside and the assessee's claim was accepted.
For private discretionary trusts whose income is chargeable at the maximum marginal rate, surcharge on income tax is to be computed by reference to the slab rates prescribed in the Finance Act for the relevant year. Applying the Special Bench ruling in Aradhya Jain Trust, the ITAT held that the assessee correctly claimed surcharge at 15% and that the lower appellate authority erred in sustaining surcharge at 25%. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside and the assessee's claim was accepted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
