Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars a lessor from recovering leased premises during moratorium while the corporate debtor or resolution professional remains in possession, even if the lease was terminated before CIRP. The Tribunal read this protection with Regulation 31(b) and applied the distinction between physical occupation and juridical possession, holding that possession continuing after termination remains protected until lawful eviction. As the resolution professional admittedly remained in possession of the leased property, the lessor could not reclaim it during moratorium, and the claim for delivery of possession was rejected.
Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars a lessor from recovering leased premises during moratorium while the corporate debtor or resolution professional remains in possession, even if the lease was terminated before CIRP. The Tribunal read this protection with Regulation 31(b) and applied the distinction between physical occupation and juridical possession, holding that possession continuing after termination remains protected until lawful eviction. As the resolution professional admittedly remained in possession of the leased property, the lessor could not reclaim it during moratorium, and the claim for delivery of possession was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
